You are browsing the archive for DWH.

Avatar of Tom

by Tom

Integrated Reporting – is that a value or a verdict?

November 14, 2011 in Asset Management, Investment Banking, Private Banking

No Gravatar

When talking to functional experts in any bank today often the “we vs. them” theme seems very dominant. Whether it’s Finance vs. Risk or Sales vs. Operations a reporting framework crossing all of these functional boundaries seems to be the exception, not the norm. Yet we have conquered far more complex integration challenges from production planning through supply chain management to integrated marketing management. Why are the functional boundaries within the financial services so much more robust than those in other industries? We’ll have a go at explaining this symptom:

  • Regulation rally – the volume and speed of regulatory change has kept many CFO functions in a requirements stranglehold for the past 3-4 years. Basel I to III, Sarbanes-Oaxley, MiFID I and II and many more just to name a few have left little room for introspection and looking beyond the brim of ones own responsibilities. But still there are a few firms that have been able to comply with the regulatory avalanche and still create an integrated view.
  • Growth greed – many Financial Services have exchanged speedy growth for sustainable growth and profitability. So often the divers functions are measured by similar objectives overstating asset growth KPIs compared to dedicated functional goals fit for distinct subject matter experts.
  • Innovation envy – focused on the corporate strategy and called to hone the intrapreneur in every role almost every function has become responsible to progress the big picture, to add his bit to the bottom line. And such it happens, that every idea, every innovation is claimed by all parties involved in bringing it to life.

But does this imply, that the integrated view is not achievable or even advisable any more? Far from it – even in such competitive or rather self-centered of environments having one integrated and single source of truth can make the difference between survival and success. The start of this integrated path however, starts with a strategic and top-down view on how and by which measures the bank should be lead by. Performance management is at last a business cultural call way before it starts to become a technology issue.

VN:F [1.9.14_1148]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.14_1148]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
http://blog.anvalad.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/digg_24.png http://blog.anvalad.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/stumbleupon_24.png http://blog.anvalad.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/delicious_24.png http://blog.anvalad.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/blogmarks_24.png http://blog.anvalad.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/technorati_24.png http://blog.anvalad.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/magnolia_24.png http://blog.anvalad.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/google_24.png http://blog.anvalad.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/facebook_24.png http://blog.anvalad.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/twitter_24.png
Avatar of Tom

by Tom

Agile, evolutionary or rapid – what’s your favorite fast track attribute?

Februar 9, 2011 in Help Wanted

No Gravatar

So we have been hearing for a long time, that analytical platforms are the ideal for fast and flexible change management. And we have learned many years all these new buzzwords that try to speed up any technology implementation project. So what happens when you bring these two things and thoughts together?

Agile development that curves around user requirements and a strategic objective and incrementally improves the solution step by step. An evolutionary approach that helps to continuously increases the overall flexibility and capability of the entire analytical platform. Or a rapid and prototyping process that puts most focus on the speed of developing new solutions and stills the hunger for fast answers and little to no planning and design lead times.

What are the preferred fast track methods you apply in your analytical roadmap and project portfolio?

VN:F [1.9.14_1148]
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.9.14_1148]
Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
http://blog.anvalad.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/digg_24.png http://blog.anvalad.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/stumbleupon_24.png http://blog.anvalad.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/delicious_24.png http://blog.anvalad.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/blogmarks_24.png http://blog.anvalad.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/technorati_24.png http://blog.anvalad.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/magnolia_24.png http://blog.anvalad.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/google_24.png http://blog.anvalad.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/facebook_24.png http://blog.anvalad.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/twitter_24.png
Avatar of Tom

by Tom

Basel III – New Projects Galore?

September 14, 2010 in Financial Services

No Gravatar

With the seemingly unanimous attitude towards the new and coming Basel III accord for the financial services industry many business consulting outfits and technology service providers expect a feeding frenzy for a never-ending stream of new projects. Are they going to be right? anvalad looks at the potential impact and assesses the likes and unlikes:

  • Most banks have struggled to achieve satisfactory solutions to cope with Basel II requirements
  • Many of the solutions in place are hot-wired and will be short-lived
  • Only few banks profited from the advanced Basel II approach, whereas most banks will have to up their credit underpinnings severely with the Basel III accord
  • The calculation approach itself will not change fundamentally hence new solutions are only asked for where none (or only bad ones) are in place

So with all of the above taken into account it seems obvious, that there will be a host of new projects. However Financial Services clients will be weary to re-live the expensive and ineffective projects they have gotten used to in so many failed Basel II implementations. Whether global consulting firms promise out-of-the-box miracles or technology powerhouses calculate razor-edged turnkey contracts, the big unknown always comes with the client’s history and is mostly spelled “heterogeneous” with a capital H.

Data integration projects will continue to be nightmarish endeavors and only when you are able to combine the knowledge of the business with the experience of the systems involved and top this mix off with a solid template-based technology framework can you hope for success. This success however must not hide behind 18 month project structures but needs to produce initial results in three to six months.

Try us – we’ve been there!

VN:F [1.9.14_1148]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.14_1148]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
http://blog.anvalad.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/digg_24.png http://blog.anvalad.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/stumbleupon_24.png http://blog.anvalad.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/delicious_24.png http://blog.anvalad.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/blogmarks_24.png http://blog.anvalad.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/technorati_24.png http://blog.anvalad.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/magnolia_24.png http://blog.anvalad.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/google_24.png http://blog.anvalad.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/facebook_24.png http://blog.anvalad.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/twitter_24.png
Avatar of Tom

by Tom

How much may process excellence cost?

April 22, 2009 in Active Business Intelligence, Financial Services

No Gravatar

It is astounding how the strive for excellence can drive large organizations into vicious circles. Like dog ever chasing the unreachable tail they try to optimize their own technology development processes in order to save cost. However the holy grail of CMMI Levels higher than three often guide them to the exact opposite. Lately I had the gutwrenching chance to overhear the following dialogue between an IT and a business expert:

“We have to fill in these forms, produce these deliverables and run through every quality gateway there is, no matter what the content of your project.”

“But I just need this once.”

“That’s what they always say in the beginning, and then it comes back, changed every month, without any documentation and with no governance on the cost end of things.”

“Couldn’t we make this one exception?”

“There’s this fine line between exception and change request. I could start the change management process for you but an exception is just the beginning of the long demise towards absolute IT service anarchy.”

“Well I guess I’m going to build my own warehouse then, that’s faster.”

“Yes, that might be my personal recommendation as well.”

Been there? Heard that. Then I guess I’m not alone in the dark…

;=)

VN:F [1.9.14_1148]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.14_1148]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
http://blog.anvalad.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/digg_24.png http://blog.anvalad.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/stumbleupon_24.png http://blog.anvalad.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/delicious_24.png http://blog.anvalad.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/blogmarks_24.png http://blog.anvalad.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/technorati_24.png http://blog.anvalad.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/magnolia_24.png http://blog.anvalad.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/google_24.png http://blog.anvalad.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/facebook_24.png http://blog.anvalad.com/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/twitter_24.png